| 1 | Total weight used to produce key products and services in the reporting period by: |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Non-renewable materials, including: | |
| raw materials: | 58 194 628 | |
| hard coal [Mg] | 7 355 732 | |
| lignite [Mg] | 50 784 793 | |
| light oil [Mg] | 7 004 | |
| heavy oil [Mg] | 47 099 | |
| materials used in the production process but which are not part of the final product (e.g. lubricants for production machinery) [kg]. | 2 668 623 | |
| semi-finished products | not applicable | |
| packaging materials | not applicable | |
| 1b | Renewable materials, including: | |
| raw materials (biomass) [Mg] | 1 517 | |
| materials that are used in the production process but are not part of the final product (e.g. lubricants for production machinery) | not applicable | |
| semi-finished products | not applicable | |
| packaging materials | not applicable |
Selected indicators in the environmental area at PGE Group:
Resources
Materials by weight and volume
-
301-1
| 1 | Total weight used to produce key products and services in the reporting period by: | |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Non-renewable materials, including: | |
| raw materials: | ||
| hard coal [Mg] | 3 380 144 | |
| lignite [Mg] | 172 673 | |
| gas [m3] | 832 945 291 | |
| light oil [Mg] | 14 246 | |
| heavy oil (mazut) [Mg] | 4 412 | |
| municipal waste [Mg] | 86 747 | |
| materials used in the production process but which are not part of the final product (e.g. lubricants for production machinery) [kg]. | 137 143 | |
| semi-finished products | not applicable | |
| packaging materials | not applicable | |
| 1b | Renewable materials, including: | |
| raw materials (biomass) [Mg] | 479 607 | |
| materials that are used in the production process but are not part of the final product (e.g. lubricants for production machinery) | not applicable | |
| semi-finished products | not applicable | |
| packaging materials | not applicable |
| 1 | Total weight used to produce key products and services in the reporting period by: |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Non-renewable materials, including: | |
| raw materials: | not applicable | |
| materials that are used in the production process but are not part of the final product (e.g. lubricants for production machinery) | ||
| production oils [litres] | 13 489 | |
| production lubricants [kg] | 15 412 | |
| semi-finished products | not applicable | |
| packaging materials | not applicable | |
| 1b | Renewable materials | not applicable |
Use of materials from recycling
-
301-2
PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, PGE Energia Ciepła and subsidiaries, PGE Energia Odnawialna, PGE Dystrybucja
| 1 | Percentage of recycled materials used to produce the organisation’s core products and services |
not applicable |
|---|
recycled material - material that replaces virgin materials that is purchased or sourced internally or externally and that is not a by-product and non-product output (NPO) produced by the organisation
Recovered products and packaging
-
301-3
PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, PGE Energia Ciepła and subsidiaries, PGE Energia Odnawialna, PGE Dystrybucja
| 1 | Percentage of recovered products per product category | not applicable |
|---|
Energy
Energy consumption at the organisation
-
302-1
| Total energy consumption at the organisation | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity (kWh) | 11 673 169 465 | 11 152 880 829 |
| Thermal energy (GJ) | 2 244 110.31 | 2 501 120.11 |
| Volume of total sold: | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity (kWh) | 100 186 719 990 | 107 633 043 564 |
| Thermal energy (GJ) | 51 282 802.25 | 53 675 235.06 |
| Cooling (GJ) | 0 | 0 |
| Steam (GJ) | 1 389 903 | 1 398 948.94 |
-
302-1
| 1 | Total consumption of energy from non-renewable sources, in joules or multiples thereof, broken down by the raw material from which it was produced | |
|---|---|---|
| lignite [Mg] | 409 644 339 | |
| hard coal [Mg] | 160 305 001 | |
| heavy oil (mazut) [Mg] | 1 918 943,5 | |
| light oil [Mg] | 301 345 | |
| 2 | Total consumption of energy from renewable sources, in joules or multiples thereof, broken down by the raw material from which it was generated | |
| biomass [GJ] | 23 709 | |
| 3 | Total consumption | |
| Electricity [MWh] | 7 126 720,5 | |
| Thermal energy [GJ] | 1 465 382 | |
| Cooling | not applicable | |
| Steam | not applicable | |
| 4 | Volume of total sold: | |
| Electricity [MWh] | 54 725 758 | |
| Thermal energy [GJ] | 2 518 553 | |
| Cooling | not applicable | |
| steam [GJ] | 702 326 | |
| 5 | Total energy consumption in the organisation in joules or multiples [GJ] | 372 140 346 |
| 6 | Source of conversion factors used | 1 MWh = 3,6 GJ |
| 1 | Total consumption of energy from non-renewable sources, in joules or multiples thereof, broken down by the raw material from which it was produced | |
|---|---|---|
| hard coal [Mg] | 74 484 245 | |
| lignite [Mg] | 1 425 960 | |
| gas [GJ] | 23 811 843 | |
| municipal waste [GJ] | 743 808 | |
| heavy oil (mazut) [Mg] | 184 734 | |
| light oil [Mg] | 610 902 | |
| 2 | Total consumption of energy from renewable sources, in joules or multiples thereof, broken down by the raw material from which it was generated | |
| biomass [GJ] | 4 250 885 | |
| 3 | Total consumption | |
| Electricity [MWh] | 1 017 713 | |
| Thermal energy [GJ] | 1 101 563 | |
| Cooling | not applicable | |
| Steam | not applicable | |
| 4 | Volume of total sold: | |
| Electricity [MWh] | 7 398 207 | |
| Thermal energy [GJ] | 49 509 094 | |
| Cooling | not applicable | |
| Steam [GJ] | not applicable | |
| 5 | Total energy consumption in the organisation in joules or multiples [GJ] | 57 081 877 |
| 6 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions or tools used | scales, fuel analysis, electricity and heat units of measure |
| 7 | Source of conversion factors used | 1 MWh = 3,6 GJ |
| 1 | Total consumption of energy from non-renewable sources, in joules or multiples thereof, broken down by the raw material from which it was produced | |
|---|---|---|
| water [MWh] | 4 157 | |
| 2 | Total consumption of energy from renewable sources, in joules or multiples thereof, broken down by the raw material from which it was generated | |
| wind [MWh] | 95 750 | |
| water [MWh] | 6 498 | |
| sunlight [MWh] | 23,6 | |
| 3 | Total consumption: | |
| Electricity [MWh] | 9 070 | |
| Thermal energy [GJ] | 2 577 | |
| Cooling | not applicable | |
| Steam | not applicable | |
| 4 | Volume of total sold: | |
| Electricity [MWh] | 3 006 565 | |
| thermal energy | not applicable | |
| Cooling | not applicable | |
| steam [MWh] | not applicable | |
| 5 | Total energy consumption in the organisation in joules or multiples | 115 500 |
| 6 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions or tools used | Quantities in GJ based on the difference (gross-net)*3.6 GJ between the amount of electricity produced by the generating units (gross) as measured at the terminals of the generators and the amounts of electricity injected into the DSO/OSP grid |
| 7 | Source of conversion factors used | not applicable |
| Total energy consumption at the organisation |
= |
Consumed non-renewable raw materials |
Energy consumption outside the organisation
-
302-2
PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, PGE Energia Ciepła and subsidiaries, PGE Energia Odnawialna, PGE Dystrybucja
No data from external counterparties
Energy intensity
-
302-3
| 1a | Energy intensity index for organisations | 10,3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1b | Selected denominator for the calculation of the indicator (organisation-specific) | Sales of electricity and heat expressed in MWh |
| 1c | Energy types included in the energy efficiency index | |
| Fuels | YES | |
| electricity | YES | |
| thermal energy | YES | |
| cooling | NO | |
| steam | YES | |
| all | NO | |
| 2 | Indicator by branch: | |
| Elektrownia Bełchatów (ELB) [GJ/MWh] | 10.7 | |
| Elektrownia Turów (ELT) [GJ/MWh] | 10 | |
| Elektrownia Opole (ELO) [GJ/MWh] | 9.2 | |
| Elektrownia Rybnik (ELR) [GJ/MWh] | 10.8 | |
| Elektrownia Dolna Odra (ELDO) [GJ/MWh] | 10.6 | |
| 3 | The indicator covers energy consumption: | within the organisation |
| 1a | Energy intensity index for organisations [GJ/MWh] | 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1b | Selected denominator for the calculation of the indicator (organisation-specific) | production volume |
| 1c | Types of energy included in the energy efficiency indicator: | |
| fuels | YES | |
| electricity | YES | |
| thermal energy | YES | |
| cooling | NO | |
| steam | YES | |
| all | NO | |
| 2 | Indicator by branch: | |
| Zespół Elektrociepłowni Wrocławskich KOGENERACJA SA [GJ/MWh] | 4.4 | |
| Branch 1 in Kraków [GJ/MWh] | 4.8 | |
| PGE Toruń SA [GJ/MWh] | 3.9 | |
| Branch Wybrzeże in Gdańsk [GJ/MWh] | 4.2 | |
| Elektrociepłownia „Zielona Góra” SA [GJ/MWh] | 5.5 | |
| Branch Elektrociepłownia w Bydgoszczy [GJ/MWh] | 4.7 | |
| Branch Elektrociepłownia w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim [GJ/MWh] | 5.1 | |
| Branch Elektrociepłownia w Kielcach [GJ/MWh] | 4.9 | |
| Branch Elektrociepłownia w Lublinie Wrotków [GJ/MWh] | 4.7 | |
| Branch Elektrociepłownia w Rzeszowie [GJ/MWh] | 4.5 | |
| Branch Elektrociepłownia w Zgierzu [GJ/MWh] | 6.5 | |
| Branch w Szczecinie – Elektrociepłownia Pomorzany [GJ/MWh] | 6.3 | |
| Branch w Szczecinie -Elektrociepłownia Szczecin [GJ/MWh] | 5.6 | |
| 3 | The indicator covers energy consumption: | within the organisation |
| 1a | Energy intensity index for organisations [GJ/MWh] | 0.65 |
|---|---|---|
| 1b | Selected denominator for the calculation of the indicator (organisation-specific) | 2 829 068 |
| 1c | The intensity ratio was calculated as electricity consumption (total energy purchases from sellers and purchases from other energy markets for the pumped storage plant – SAP data source) to net energy produced. | |
| 2 | Types of energy included in the energy efficiency indicator: | |
| Fuels | NO | |
| electricity | YES | |
| electricity | NO | |
| cooling | NO | |
| steam | NO | |
| all | NO | |
| 3 | The indicator covers energy consumption: | within the organisation |
Reducing energy consumption
-
302-4
| 1 | The magnitude of the achieved reduction in energy consumption as a direct result of maintenance (modernisation) measures or an efficiency initiative, in joules or multiples | 1 857.5 GJ |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Types of energy included in the indicated energy reduction: | |
| fuels | NO | |
| electricity | YES | |
| thermal energy | NO | |
| cooling | NO | |
| steam | NO | |
| all | NO | |
| 3 | Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption, including | |
| 3a | Base year or base level | 2022 |
| 3b | Justification for the choice of the year or baseline | Start of reporting in 2022 |
| 4 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions or tools used | REGULATION OF THE MINISTER OF ENERGY of 5 October 2017 on the detailed scope and manner of drawing up an energy efficiency audit and methods for calculating energy savings. |
| 1 | The magnitude of the achieved reduction in energy consumption as a direct result of maintenance (retrofitting) measures or an efficiency initiative, in joules or multiples | 23 148 GJ |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Types of energy included in the indicated energy reduction: | |
| fuels | NO | |
| electricity | YES | |
| thermal energy | YES | |
| cooling | NO | |
| steam | NO | |
| all | NO | |
| 3 | Basis for calculating reductions in energy consumption, including | |
| 3a | Base year or base level | 2022 |
| 3b | Justification for the choice of the year or baseline | Start of reporting in 2022 |
| 4 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions or tools used | REGULATION OF THE MINISTER OF ENERGY of 5 October 2017 on the detailed scope and manner of drawing up an energy efficiency audit and methods for calculating energy savings. |
Reducing energy consumption within products and services
-
302-5
| 1a | Achieved reduction in energy demand of products sold during the reporting period, in joules or multiples [GJ]. | 23 148 |
|---|---|---|
| 1b | Achieved reduction in energy demand of sold services during the reporting period, in joules or multiples | not applicable |
| 2 | Basis for calculating energy demand reduction, including | |
| 2a | Base year or base level | 2021 |
| 2b | Justification for the choice of the year or baseline | Methodology as for white certificates |
| 3 | Please indicate the standards, methodologies, assumptions or tools used | Methodology as for white certificates |
| 1 | Achieved reduction in energy demand of products sold during the reporting period | not applicable |
Water management
| 1 | Total water abstraction in megalitres*: | 23 343 193 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Total water discharged (sum of waste water, used water and unused water) in megalitres | 23 200 358 |
| 3 | Total water consumption from all areas in megalitres** | 155 735 |
*The data concerns the following companies: PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, PGE Energia Ciepła with subsidiaries and PGE Energia Odnawialna.
** The volume of 12,901 megalitres does not balance. The difference relates to PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna and is due to the fact that the company discharges more water than it takes in. The additional discharge volume is accounted for by the amount of water from outside the organisation treated at PGE GiEK's treatment plants and rainwater and snowmelt, which also needs to be accounted for in terms of discharge.
** The volume of 12,901 megalitres does not balance. The difference relates to PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna and is due to the fact that the company discharges more water than it takes in. The additional discharge volume is accounted for by the amount of water from outside the organisation treated at PGE GiEK's treatment plants and rainwater and snowmelt, which also needs to be accounted for in terms of discharge.
Water intake
-
303-3
| 1 | Total water abstraction by organisation at all sites, in megalitres, by source: | |
|---|---|---|
| surface water | 804 740 | |
| groundwater | 2 187 | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | 194 062 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 501.5 | |
| 2 | Total water abstraction by organisation at water-scarce locations, in megalitres, by source: | |
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3 | Breakdown of the total water abstraction from each source in megalitres, according to the following categories: | |
| 3a | All locations | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | 966 779 | |
| surface water | 782 871 | |
| groundwater | 2 187 | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | 181 266 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 455 | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) 34 711 | ||
| surface water | 21 869 | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | 12 796 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 46 | |
| 3b | Locations with a water deficit | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 4 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure of July 13, 2021 on the form and manner of monitoring of surface water bodies and groundwater bodies (Polish Journal of Laws of 2021 item 1576) |
| 1 | Total water abstraction by organisation at all sites, in megalitres, by source: | |
|---|---|---|
| surface water | 119 564 | |
| groundwater | 1 979 | |
| sea water | 44 287 | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) |
0 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 1 233 | |
| 2 | Total water abstraction by organisation at water scarcity locations, in megalitres, by source: | |
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) |
not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3 | Breakdown of total water withdrawals from each source listed in Sections 303-3.1 and 303-3.2, in megalitres, by the following categories: | |
| 3a | All locations | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | 119 564 | |
| groundwater | 1 979 | |
| sea water | 30 210 | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) |
0 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 1 233 | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | 14 078 | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) |
not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3b | Locations with a water deficit | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) |
not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) |
not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 4 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | The data were collected according to the specific operation of the selected installation. In the case of abstracted water from waterworks, the quantities abstracted have been converted on the basis of meter readings including contracts. In the case of surface water, the quantities abstracted were presented on the basis of current reporting and water abstraction records, and other regulatory reporting. |
| 1 | Total water abstraction by organisation at all sites, in megalitres, by source: | |
|---|---|---|
| surface water | 22 174 638 | |
| groundwater | 5 | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 7 | |
| 2 | Total water abstraction by organisation at water-scarce locations, in megalitres, by source: | |
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3 | Breakdown of total water withdrawals from each source listed in Sections 303-3.1 and 303-3.2, in megalitres, by the following categories: | |
| 3a | All locations | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | 22 174 637 | |
| groundwater | 5 | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 7 | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3b | Locations with a water deficit | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 4 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | Surface water consumed for electricity production calculated from average daily flows resulting from daily production + proxies from water flow reports manually run from flow tables. The amount of water for turbine bearing cooling is determined by measuring the water flow through the coolers times the hydrogenerator hours worked. Water taken for welfare purposes according to the installed water meter. |
| 1 | Total water abstraction by organisation at all sites, in megalitres, by source: | |
|---|---|---|
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 2 | Total water abstraction by organisation at water scarcity locations, in megalitres, by source: | |
| surface water | 0 | |
| groundwater | 0,3 | |
| sea water | 0 | |
| production water (obtained as a result of extraction, processing or use of any other raw material) | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | PGE Dystrybucja SA uses the water supply network to a significant extent |
Water discharge
-
303-4
| 1 | Total water discharged (sum of effluent, consumed water and unused water) in megalitres, at all locations, due to discharge destination missions, if applicable: | |
| surface water | 879 467 | |
| groundwater | 0 | |
| sea water | 0 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) and an indication of what proportion of this value has been transferred to other organisations (if applicable) | 31 | |
| 2 | Total water discharged (sum of waste water, used water and unused water) in megalitres, broken down into: | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | 867 439.5 | |
| groundwater | 0 | |
| sea water | 0 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 31 | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | 12 026.5 | |
| groundwater | 0 | |
| sea water | 0 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 0 | |
| 3 | Total water discharged (sum of wastewater, used water and unused water) in megalitres, at locations with water shortages, due to discharge targets, if applicable: | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | 575 212 | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | 0 | |
| 4 | Substances that may present a hazard | |
| How substances of concern are defined | Hazardous substances have been defined on the basis of Annex 1 to the Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Inland Navigation of 12 July 2019 on substances particularly harmful to the aquatic environment and conditions to be met when discharging waste water into waters or into the ground, and when discharging rainwater or snowmelt into waters or into aquatic facilities, as well as balances taking into account the quality of intake water. Characteristic substances with a higher value at discharge than at abstraction were identified and discharge limits were set for them. When setting the limits, the environmental objectives set out in the current aPGW were taken into account. The characteristic substances are different and location-dependent and are included in the permits. These are mainly sulphate, chlorides, suspended solids, petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals |
|
| Approach adopted regarding the limit on the discharge/discharge of substances of potential concern | Assessment of discharges is carried out in accordance with the Waste Water Discharge Regulation and current permits. | |
| Number of cases of non-compliance with discharge limits/discharges of substances of concern | 0 | |
| 5 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | Data is collected and reported in accordance with applicable regulations. Testing methodology in accordance with water law permit and wastewater discharge ordinance. |
| 1 | Total water discharged (sum of effluent, consumed water and unused water) in megalitres, at all locations, due to discharge destination missions, if applicable: | |
| surface water | 114 057 | |
| groundwater | 0 | |
| sea water | 44 776 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) and an indication of what proportion of this value has been transferred to other organisations (if applicable) | 961 | |
| 2 | Total water discharged (sum of waste water, used water and unused water) in megalitres, broken down into: | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | 114 057 | |
| groundwater | 0 | |
| sea water | 30 409 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 715 | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | 0 | |
| groundwater | 0 | |
| sea water | 14 367 | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | 245 | |
| 3 | Total water discharged (sum of wastewater, used water and unused water) in megalitres, at locations with water shortages, due to discharge targets, if applicable: | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | not applicable | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | not applicable | |
| 4 | Substances that may present a hazard | |
| How substances of concern are defined | Substances of concern are defined in the required administrative decisions (water permits, integrated permit), which agree on the concentration limits and the scope of substances to be tested on the basis of current legislation. In some cases, in addition, Substances of Concern were defined in contracts with (water and sewer) suppliers. | |
| Approach adopted regarding the limit on the discharge/discharge of substances of potential concern | Rational management, reduction of consumption, quantitative and qualitative limits in accordance with administrative decisions, values resulting from legislation and applicable standards. | |
| Number of cases of non-compliance with discharge limits/discharges of substances of concern | There were incidental events related to the increase of selected parameters of the discharged wastewater, in particular there were breakdowns of the wastewater treatment plant in the commissioning process after a maintenance shutdown. The violations that occurred were so insignificant that they did not lead to administrative proceedings and the imposition of criminal sanctions. | |
| 5 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | The aggregated data was compiled on the basis of reports and statements required by law. Total water discharged including the discharge of wastewater into third-party sewers was provided on the basis of the records kept. The state and composition of wastewater – based on results of analyses by accredited entities. |
| 1 | Total water discharged (sum of effluent, consumed water and unused water) in megalitres, at all locations, due to discharge destination missions, if applicable: | |
| surface water | 22 161 067 | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) and an indication of what proportion of this value has been transferred to other organisations (if applicable) | 9.5 | |
| 2 | Total water discharged (sum of waste water, used water and unused water) in megalitres, broken down into: | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | ||
| surface water | not applicable | |
| groundwater | not applicable | |
| sea water | not applicable | |
| water obtained from an indirect source (e.g. local water supply) | not applicable | |
| 3 | Total water discharged (sum of wastewater, used water and unused water) in megalitres, at locations with water shortages, due to discharge targets, if applicable: | |
| Fresh water (<1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS)) | not applicable | |
| residual (>1000mg/L of total dissolved substances (TDS) | not applicable | |
| 4 | Substances that may present a hazard | not applicable |
| How substances of concern are defined | Substances that may constitute a hazard are defined in water permits in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 20 July 2017 – Water Law (i.e. Journal of Laws of 2021, item 2233, as amended) and the Ordinance of 12 July 2019 on substances particularly harmful to the aquatic environment and conditions to be met when discharging waste water into waters or into the ground, and when discharging rainwater or snowmelt into waters or into water facilities. | |
| Approach adopted regarding the limit on the discharge/discharge of substances of potential concern | The company takes into account the risk of harmful substances entering the environment in its operations. Mainly preventive measures are taken, which consist in: 1. Installation of oil separators in places where there may be at least a risk of oil substances entering the water, 2. Prevention of failures by continuous monitoring of equipment operation by the power plant staff, regular inspections, carrying out repair, operation and modernisation works, 3. Observance of the provisions contained in the equipment operation instructions, 4. Securing the facilities with ecological first-aid kits for elimination of the effects of possible oil spills and installation of oil separators. |
|
| Number of cases of non-compliance with discharge limits/discharges of substances of concern | not applicable | |
| 5 | Contextual information to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as standards, methodologies, assumptions made | The calculations take into account water returned in the electricity production process, leakage water and industrial wastewater. The calculations show the annual quanta from existing water rights decisions and, in the case of water used for energy production, the amount of water was calculated on the basis of the operation time of the hydro-complexes (data from the measurement system) and their throughput. |
Use of water
-
303-5
| 1 | Total water consumption from all areas in megalitres (ML) | 134 894 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Total water consumption from water scarcity areas in megalitres (ML) | 0 |
| 3 | Change in the level of water storage in megalitres (ML) if water storage has been identified as having a significant impact on water issues | 0 |
| 4 | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as: the standards, methodologies and assumptions used, including: whether the data were calculated, estimated, modelled, derived from other sources and the approach taken to do so, for example the use of sector-specific factors | Data is collected and reported in accordance with applicable regulations. Testing methodology in accordance with water law permit and wastewater discharge regulation. |
|
Use of water |
= | Water intake – Water discharge |
Water scarcity – a situation where the demand for water exceeds the amount of water available at any given time, or poor water quality limits the use of water.
| Change in water storage levels |
= |
Water stored at the end of the reporting period – Water stored at the beginning of the reporting period |
| 1 | Total water consumption from all areas in megalitres (ML) | 7 270 |
| 2 | Total water consumption from water scarcity areas in megalitres (ML) | not applicable |
| 3 | Change in the level of water storage in megalitres (ML) if water storage has been identified as having a significant impact on water issues | not applicable |
| 4 | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as: the standards, methodologies and assumptions used, including: whether the data were calculated, estimated, modelled, derived from other sources and the approach taken to do so, for example the use of sector-specific factors | Consumption calculated on the basis of the formula presented, including water withdrawn and water discharged. The aggregated data were compiled on the basis of reports and statements required by law. Water abstraction and total water discharged, including the discharge of wastewater into third-party sewers, were provided on the basis of the records kept. |
| 1 | Total water consumption from all areas in megalitres (ML) | 13 571 |
| 2 | Total water consumption from water scarcity areas in megalitres (ML) | not applicable |
| 3 | Change in the level of water storage in megalitres (ML) if water storage has been identified as having a significant impact on water issues | not applicable |
| 4 | Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data were collected and calculated, such as: the standards, methodologies and assumptions used, including: whether the data were calculated, estimated, modelled, derived from other sources and the approach taken to do so, for example the use of sector-specific factors | Consumption calculated on the basis of the formula presented, including water withdrawn and water discharged. The aggregated data were compiled on the basis of reports and statements required by law. Water abstraction and total water discharged, including the discharge of wastewater into third-party sewers, were provided on the basis of the records kept. |
CO₂ emissions
CO2 emissions from the Group’s main installations and the allocation of free CO2 allowances for 2022.
-
Own indicator
| CO2 emissions in 2022* | Allocation of CO2 emission allowances for 2022 | CO2 emissions in 2021 | CO2 emissions in 2020 | CO2 emissions in 2019 | |
| PGE Group power plants and combined heat and power plants, total | 70 010 418 | 638 546 | 70 746 383 | 59 518 765 | 60 663 255 |
*The CO2 emission volumes indicated above refer to all PGE Group installations operating under the EU ETS. CO2 emission volume is calculated on the basis of and in accordance with the legal provisions governing the ETS, in particular the competent authority's decisions authorising the installation's greenhouse gas emissions.
Direct greenhouse gas emissions (scope 1)
-
305-1
| 1 | Gross greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | |
| Scope 1 emissions come from the following sources owned or controlled by the organisation: generation of electricity, heat, cooling, steam; chemical or physical processing; transportation of materials, products, waste, employees, passengers; fugitive emissions (from escaping refrigerants) |
61 700 646 | |
| 2 | Country | Poland |
| 3 | Branches: Elektrownia Bełchatów, Elektrownia Opole, Elektrownia Turów, Elektrownia Dolna Odra Elektrownia Rybnik, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Bełchatów, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Turów, Central Office | |
| 4 | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 60 690 662 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 38 506 | |
| process (b) | 822 460 | |
| volatile (d) | 148 971 | |
| 5 | Type of activity | |
| type of activity | production of electricity and heat | |
| type of activity | lignite mining | |
| 6 | Results for individual gases included in the calculations | |
| CO2 | 61 551 627 | |
| CH4 | 175 | |
| N2O | 147 444 | |
| HFC | 1 400 | |
| PFC | not applicable | |
| SF6 | not applicable | |
| NF3 | not applicable | |
| all | ||
| 7 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 69 |
| 8 | Base year for calculations | 2021 |
| justification for the choice of a given year as the base year | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 61 502 916 | |
| context of significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | not applicable | |
| 9 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC, verified CO2 emissions from installations under the EU ETS. |
| 10 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | |
| Criterion used to consolidate the level of emissions within the organisation | operational control | |
| 11 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064- 1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | |
| Scope 1 emissions come from the following sources owned or controlled by the organisation: generation of electricity, heat, cooling, steam; chemical or physical processing; transportation of materials, products, waste, employees, passengers; fugitive emissions (from escaping refrigerants) |
8 602 879 | |
| 2 | Country | Poland |
| 3 | Branch/Company: Branch Elektrociepłownia w Bydgoszczy, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim, Branch Wybrzeże w Gdańsku, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Kielcach, Branch 1 in Kraków, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Lublinie Wrotków, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Rzeszowie, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Zgierzu, Elektrociepłownia „Zielona Góra” SA, Zespół Elektrociepłowni Wrocławskich KOGENERACJA SA, PGE Toruń SA, Branch in Szczecin – Elektrociepłownia Pomorzany, Branch in Szczecin – Elektrociepłownia Szczecin, Central Office | |
| 4 | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 8 553 063 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 26 654 | |
| process (b) | 22 464 | |
| volatile (d | 698 | |
| 5 | Type of activity | |
| Production of electricity and heat | ||
| 6 | Results for individual gases included in the calculations | |
| CO2 | 8 602 181 | |
| CH4 | 272 | |
| N2O | 112 | |
| HFC | 314 | |
| PFC | not applicable | |
| SF6 | not applicable | |
| NF3 | not applicable | |
| 7 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 20 916 |
| 8 | Base year for calculations | 2021 |
| justification for the choice of a given year as the base year | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 9 434 875 | |
| context of significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | Reduction in direct emissions from fuel combustion, which resulted from reduced production. | |
| 9 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC, verified CO2 emissions from installations under the EU ETS. |
| 10 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | |
| Criterion used to consolidate the level of emissions within the organisation | operational control | |
| 11 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064- 1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent or similar unit | 61 175 |
| Scope 1 emissions come from the following sources owned or controlled by the organisation: generation of electricity, heat, cooling, steam; chemical or physical processing; transportation of materials, products, waste, employees, passengers; fugitive emissions (from escaping refrigerants) |
||
| 2 | Country | Poland |
| 3 | Branches: ZEW Porąbka- Żar, ZEW Dychów, ZEW Solina – Myczkowce, EW Żarnowiec, Central Office | |
| 4 | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 85 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 838 | |
| process (b) | not applicable | |
| volatile (d) | 60 252 | |
| 5 | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity | ||
| 6 | Results for individual gases included in the calculations | |
| CO2 | 924 | |
| CH4 | 60 175 | |
| N2O | not applicable | |
| HFC | 77 | |
| PFC | not applicable | |
| SF6 | not applicable | |
| NF3 | not applicable | |
| 7 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | not applicable |
| 8 | Base year for calculations | 2021 |
| justification for the choice of a given year as the base year | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 23 631.3 | |
| context of significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | ||
| 9 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 10 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | |
| Criterion used to consolidate the level of emissions within the organisation | operational control | |
| 11 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064- 1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross greenhouse gas emissions in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 16 983 |
| Scope 1 emissions come from the following sources owned or controlled by the organisation: generation of electricity, heat, cooling, steam; chemical or physical processing; transportation of materials, products, waste, employees, passengers; fugitive emissions (from escaping refrigerants) |
||
| 2 | Country | Poland |
| 3 | Branches: Skarżysko-Kamienna Branch, Warsaw Branch, Rzeszów Branch, Zamość Branch, Lublin Branch, Białystok Branch, Łódź Branch, Head Office | |
| 4 | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 1 482 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 14 721 | |
| process (b) | not applicable | |
| volatile (d) | 780 | |
| 5 | Type of activity | |
| Transmission of electricity | ||
| 6 | Results for individual gases included in the calculations | |
| CO2 | 16 203 | |
| CH4 | not applicable | |
| N2O | not applicable | |
| HFC | 334 | |
| PFC | not applicable | |
| SF6 | 447 | |
| NF3 | not applicable | |
| 7 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent or similar unit | not applicable |
| 8 | Base year for calculations | 2021 |
| justification for the choice of a given year as the base year | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 18 769 | |
| context of significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | not applicable | |
| 9 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 10 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | |
| Criterion used to consolidate the level of emissions within the organisation | operational control | |
| 11 | Wykorzystane standardy, metodologie, założenia i/lub narzędzia kalkulacyjne | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064- 1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
Indirect greenhouse gas emissions (scope 1)
-
305-2
| 1 | Gross indirect emissions (Scope 2) by location in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent or equivalent unit, including (where this would allow greater transparency or comparability over time) by | 776 071 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branches: Elektrownia Bełchatów, Elektrownia Opole, Elektrownia Turów, Elektrownia Dolna Odra Elektrownia Rybnik, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Bełchatów, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Turów, Central Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | 742 068 | |
| thermal | 34 004 | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| Production of electricity and heat | ||
| lignite mining | ||
| 2 | If applicable: gross indirect emissions (scope 2) on a market basis, in tonnes (t) of CO2 | no information from counterparties for scope 2 market-based calculation |
| 3. | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| 4 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 688 395 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | ||
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross indirect emissions (Scope 2) by location in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent or equivalent unit, including (where this would allow greater transparency or comparability over time) by | 19 223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branch/Company: Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Bydgoszczy, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim, Oddział Wybrzeże w Gdańsku, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Kielcach, Oddział nr 1 w Krakowie, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Lublinie Wrotków, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Rzeszowie, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Zgierzu, Elektrociepłownia „Zielona Góra” SA, Zespół Elektrociepłowni Wrocławskich KOGENERACJA SA, PGE Toruń SA, Oddział w Szczecinie – Elektrociepłownia Pomorzany, Oddział w Szczecinie -Elektrociepłownia Szczecin, Central Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | 19 016 | |
| thermal | 208 | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity and heat | ||
| 2 | Gross indirect emissions (scope 2) marked-based, in tonnes (t) of CO2 | no information from counterparties for scope 2 market-based calculation |
| 3 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| 4 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 10 514 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | Increased energy purchases | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross indirect emissions (scope 2) location-based, in tonnes (t) of CO2 | 15 430 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branches: ZEW Porąbka- Żar, ZEW Dychów, ZEW Solina – Myczkowce, EW Żarnowiec, Central Office | |
| Branch ZEW Porąbka-Żar | ||
| Branch ZEW Dychów | ||
| Branch ZEW Solina – Myczkowce | ||
| Branch EW Żarnowiec | ||
| PGE Energia Odnawialna SA | ||
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | 14 762 | |
| thermal | 263 | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity | ||
| 2 | Gross indirect emissions (scope 2) marked-based, in tonnes (t) of CO2 | 15 025 |
| 3 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| 4 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 10 812 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | not applicable | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross indirect emissions (scope 2), in tonnes (t) of CO2 | 1 381 213 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branches: Skarżysko-Kamienna Branch, Warsaw Branch, Rzeszów Branch, Zamość Branch, Lublin Branch, Białystok Branch, Łódź Branch, Head Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | 49 228 | |
| thermal | 9 393 | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| Type of activity | ||
| distribution of electricity | ||
| 2 | Gross indirect emissions (scope 2) marked-based, in tonnes (t) of CO2 or similar unit | no information from counterparties for scope 2 market-based calculation |
| 3 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| 4 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 1 428 506 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | none | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
Other indirect greenhouse gas emissions (scope 3)
-
305-3
| 1 | Gross other indirect emissions (scope 3), in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 22 296 274 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branches: Elektrownia Bełchatów, Elektrownia Opole, Elektrownia Turów, Elektrownia Dolna Odra Elektrownia Rybnik, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Bełchatów, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Turów, Central Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | ||
| thermal | ||
| cooling | ||
| steam | ||
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity and heat | ||
| lignite mining | ||
| 2 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| 3 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 124,5 |
| 4 | Other Scope 3 indirect emission categories and activities included in the calculations | 22 296 150 |
| 5 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 21 523 351 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the base year emissions base | none | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross other indirect emissions (scope 3) locationbased, in tonnes (t) of CO2 | 1 937 297 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branch/Company: Branch Elektrociepłownia w Bydgoszczy, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim, Branch Wybrzeże w Gdańsku, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Kielcach, Branch 1 in Kraków, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Lublinie Wrotków, Branch Elektrociepłownia w Rzeszowie, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Zgierzu, Elektrociepłownia „Zielona Góra” SA, Zespół Elektrociepłowni Wrocławskich KOGENERACJA SA, PGE Toruń SA, Branch in Szczecin – Elektrociepłownia Pomorzany, Branch in Szczecin – Elektrociepłownia Szczecin, Central Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | 724 549 | |
| thermal | 1 212 748 | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity and heat | ||
| 2 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| all | NO | |
| 3 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent or similar unit | 37 835 |
| 4 | Other Scope 3 indirect emission categories and activities included in the calculations | 1 899 462 |
| 5 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 1 973 654 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | none | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross other indirect emissions (scope 3), in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 12 188 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branches: ZEW Porąbka- Żar, ZEW Dychów, ZEW Solina – Myczkowce, EW Żarnowiec, Central Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | not applicable | |
| thermal | not applicable | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity | ||
| 2 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| 3 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | not applicable |
| 4 | Other Scope 3 indirect emission categories and activities included in the calculations | not applicable |
| 5 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 10 110 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | none | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| 1 | Gross other indirect emissions (scope 3), in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 416 890 |
|---|---|---|
| 1a | Country | Poland |
| 1b | Branches: Skarżysko-Kamienna Branch, Warsaw Branch, Rzeszów Branch, Zamość Branch, Lublin Branch, Białystok Branch, Łódź Branch, Head Office | |
| 1c | Type of energy | |
| electric | not applicable | |
| thermal | not applicable | |
| cooling | not applicable | |
| steam | not applicable | |
| 1d | Type of activity | |
| transmission of electricity | ||
| 2 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | NO | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | NO | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| all | NO | |
| 3 | Biogenic CO2 in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent or similar unit | not applicable |
| 4 | Other Scope 3 indirect emission categories and activities included in the calculations | not applicable |
| 5 | The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public | |
| level of emission in base year | 437 974 | |
| context of any significant changes in emissions that resulted in a recalculation of the mission base for the base year | none | |
| 5 | Source of emission factors and Global Warming Potential (GWP) used, or reference to the source of the GWP | GHG Protocol, KOBIZE, DERFA, IPCC |
| 6 | Approach to issue consolidation: equity participation, financial control or operational control. | operational control |
| 7 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
Intensity of greenhouse gas emissions
-
305-4
| 1 | Greenhouse gas emission intensity factor for the organisation | 0,9788 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Selected denominator for the calculation of the indicator (organisationspecific) (gross sum of electricity and heat production) |
63 033 322 |
| 3 | Indicator by: | |
| 3a | Country | Poland |
| 3b | Branches: Elektrownia Bełchatów, Elektrownia Opole, Elektrownia Turów, Elektrownia Dolna Odra Elektrownia Rybnik, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Bełchatów, Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Turów, Central Office | |
| 3c | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 0,962835 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 0,000612 | |
| process (b) | 0,013048 | |
| volatile (d) | 0,002363 | |
| 3d | Type of activity | |
| Production of electricity and heat | ||
| lignite mining | ||
| 4 | Types of greenhouse gas emissions used in the indicator | |
| Scope 1 | YES | |
| Scope 2 | YES | |
| Scope 3 | NO | |
| 5 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | YES | |
| N2O | YES | |
| HFC | YES | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO |
| Greenhouse gas emissions indicator | Total greenhouse gas emissions |
| Indicator specific to the organisation |
| 1 | Greenhouse gas emission intensity factor for the organisation | 0.384 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Selected denominator for the calculation of the indicator (organisationspecific) (gross sum of electricity and heat production) |
22 474 431 |
| 3 | Indicator by: | |
| 3a | Country | Poland |
| 3b | Branch/Company: Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Bydgoszczy, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim, Oddział Wybrzeże w Gdańsku, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Kielcach, Oddział nr 1 w Krakowie, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Lublinie Wrotków, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Rzeszowie, Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Zgierzu, Elektrociepłownia „Zielona Góra” SA, Zespół Elektrociepłowni Wrocławskich KOGENERACJA SA, PGE Toruń SA, Oddział w Szczecinie – Elektrociepłownia Pomorzany, Oddział w Szczecinie -Elektrociepłownia Szczecin, Central Office | |
| 3c | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 0.3805686 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 0.0011860 | |
| process (b) | 0.0009995 | |
| volatile (d) | 0.0009995 | |
| 3d | Type of activity | |
| production of electricity and heat | ||
| 4 | Types of greenhouse gas emissions used in the indicator | |
| Scope 1 | YES | |
| Scope 2 | YES | |
| Scope 3 | NO | |
| 5 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | YES | |
| N2O | YES | |
| HFC | YES | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO |
| 1 | Greenhouse gas emission intensity factor for the organisation | 0.02606 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Selected denominator for the calculation of the indicator (organisationspecific) (gross production of electricity) |
2 923 717 |
| 3 | Indicator by: | |
| 3a | Country | Poland |
| 3b | Branches: ZEW Porąbka- Żar, ZEW Dychów, ZEW Solina – Myczkowce, EW Żarnowiec, Central Office | |
| 3c | Type of source of emission | |
| combustion in stationary sources (a) | 0.000039 | |
| combustion in mobile sources (c) | 0.000276 | |
| process (b) | NO | |
| volatile (d) | 0.0206 | |
| 3d | type of activity | |
| production of electricity | ||
| 4 | Types of greenhouse gas emissions used in the indicator | |
| Scope 1 | YES | |
| Scope 2 | YES | |
| Scope 3 | NO | |
| 5 | Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES | |
| CH4 | YES | |
| N2O | NO | |
| HFC | YES | |
| PFC | NO | |
| SF6 | NO | |
| NF3 | NO | |
| all | NO |
Reduction of GHG emissions
-
305-5
| GHG emission reductions achieved as a result of the measures taken (in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | none – the increase in CO2 in 2022 compared to 2021 was due to an increase in the load on generating units and an increase in production, and thus an increase in fuel and raw material consumption. |
| Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES |
| CH4 | YES |
| N2O | YES |
| HFC | YES |
| PFC | NO |
| SF6 | NO |
| NF3 | NO |
| all | |
| The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public |
| level of emission in base year | 83 714 662 |
| Scopes within which emission reductions have been achieved | |
| Scope 1 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Scope 2 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Scope 3 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| GHG emission reductions achieved as a result of the measures taken (in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 859 644 |
|---|---|
| Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES |
| CH4 | YES |
| N2O | YES |
| HFC | YES |
| PFC | NO |
| SF6 | NO |
| NF3 | NO |
| all | NO |
| The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public |
| level of emission in base year | 11 419 043 |
| Scopes within which emission reductions have been achieved | |
| Scope 1 | YES |
| level of reduction | 831 996 |
| Scope 2 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Scope 3 | YES |
| level of reduction | 36 358 |
| Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| GHG emission reductions achieved as a result of the measures taken (in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | none |
|---|---|
| Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES |
| CH4 | YES |
| N2O | NO |
| HFC | YES |
| PFC | NO |
| SF6 | NO |
| NF3 | NO |
| The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public |
| level of emission in base year | 44 113 |
| Scopes within which emission reductions have been achieved | |
| Scope 1 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Scope 2 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Scope 3 | NO |
| level of reduction | |
| Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
| GHG emission reductions achieved as a result of the measures taken (in tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent | 70 162.5 |
|---|---|
| Gases taken into account in the calculations: | |
| CO2 | YES |
| CH4 | YES |
| N2O | NO |
| HFC | YES |
| PFC | NO |
| SF6 | NO |
| NF3 | NO |
| The adopted base year for the calculation, together with indication of | 2021 |
| why a particular year was chosen | 2021 is the first year in which PGE Group’s carbon footprint was calculated and made public |
| level of emission in base year | 1 885 249 |
| Scopes within which emission reductions have been achieved | |
| Scope 1 | YES |
| level of reduction | 1 785.5 |
| Scope 2 | YES |
| level of reduction | 47 293 |
| Scope 3 | YES |
| level of reduction | 21 084 |
| Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | GHG Protocol, standard ISO 14064-1:2018, system tools for calculating carbon footprint |
Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS)
-
305-6
PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, PGE Energia Ciepła, PGE Energia Odnawialna, PGE Dystrybucja
| 1 | Production of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in metric tonnes of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent | not applicable |
|---|---|---|
| Imports of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in metric tonnes of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent | not applicable | |
| Exports of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in metric tonnes of CFC-11 (trichlorofluoromethane) equivalent | not applicable |
Nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur oxides (SOX), and other significant air emissions
-
305-7
PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, PGE Energia Ciepła, PGE Energia Odnawialna, PGE Dystrybucja
| 1 | Please provide data on significant air emissions (in kg or multiples) for each of the following: | PGE GiEK | PGE EC | PGE EO | PGE Dystrybucja |
| SOx | 47 342 676 | 9 655 995 | not applicable | 3 109 | |
| NOx | 42 815 020 | 7 521 767 | not applicable | 13 822 | |
| Persistent organic pollutants (POP) | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | |
| Volatile organic compounds (VOC) | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | |
| Hazardous air pollutants (HAP) | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | |
| Particulate matter (PM) | 1 278 420 | 611 547 | not applicable | not applicable | |
| Other standard categories of emissions to air as defined in the relevant legislation | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable | |
| 2 | Please indicate the source of the emission factors used | Factors determined on the basis of measurements carried out by accredited entities | not applicable | not applicable | |
| 3 | Standards, methodologies, assumptions and/or calculation tools used | Emission standards set in accordance with applicable legislation and administrative decisions. Emission volumes given on the basis of indications from continuous monitoring systems and periodic measurements. | not applicable | not applicable | |
Biodiversity
Significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity
-
304-2
| 1a | Nature of significant direct impacts on biodiversity in relation to one or more of the following: | |
| Construction or use of production facilities, mines and transport infrastructure | ELR: Rybnik Reservoir – surface water used for technological purposes. | |
| Contamination (introduction of substances that do not naturally occur in the habitat) | Discharge of treated industrial wastewater and mine drainage water. | |
| Introduction of invasive species, pests and pathogens | The activity does not lead to the introduction of invasive species, pests or pathogens. | |
| Species extinction | Activities do not lead to species extinction. | |
| Habitat destruction | Activities do not lead to habitat destruction. Removal of trees and shrubs and mowing of grasses takes place outside the bird breeding season. |
|
| Changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability (such as salinity or changes in groundwater levels) | Groundwater (groundwater) abstraction is carried out for drinking water and process water recharge. This abstraction is carried out in accordance with hydrogeological documentation, in an amount not exceeding the exploitable resources of the intakes. | |
| 1b |
Nature of significant indirect effects on biodiversity in relation to one or more of the following: (please describe) |
|
| Construction or use of production facilities, mines and transport infrastructure | No impact | |
| Contamination (introduction of substances that do not naturally occur in the habitat) | Introduction of gaseous pollutants and CO2 into the air. | |
| Introduction of invasive species, pests and pathogens | The activity does not lead to the indirect introduction of invasive species, pests or pathogens. | |
| Species extinction | Activities do not lead to the indirect extinction of species. | |
| Habitat destruction | Activities do not lead to indirect habitat destruction. | |
| Changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability (such as salinity or changes in groundwater levels) | Activities do not lead to changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability. | |
| 2a | Significant direct positive and negative impacts in relation to the following: | |
| affected species | The company discharges only treated wastewater that is safe for the aquatic environment and does not adversely affect aquatic species and the aquatic ecosystem. The Company carries out quantitative and qualitative monitoring of discharged wastewater. The quantity of substances released in the treated wastewater is in accordance with the permits held, as well as with the applicable law. ELR: Rybnik Reservoir has a positive impact on fauna and flora. Rybnik Reservoir plays the most important role in winter, when it becomes one of the wintering places for wetland birds in Silesia. The elevated water temperature attracts not only birds associated with the aquatic environment, but also raptors and passerines. Apart from rare species, i.e. white-tailed godwit, grey-headed gull, common species such as blackheaded gull, grey-headed gull, white-headed gull, cormorant, mallard or coot, also appear, and the concentration of one species may reach 5,000 individuals. During the breeding season, on the other hand, side ponds with a narrow strip of riparian vegetation surrounded by pine forests, fields and meadows are attractive for birds. It is then possible to observe grebes, aquatic warblers or bitterns listed in the Polish Red Book of Animals. A total of 74 wetland bird species were found, of which 22 were breeding. |
|
| extent of the area affected | The extent of the impact of water use in terms of deep water abstraction corresponds to the extent of the depression funnel of the intake. Pumping of groundwater does not adversely affect surface waters. ELR: The area of the Rybnik Reservoir together with the surrounding green areas. Around the Rybnik Reservoir there are natural protected areas in the form of the Cistercian Landscape Compositions of the Ore Mountains Landscape Park. |
|
| duration of impact | The duration of impact on groundwater and watercourses into which wastewater is discharged is related to the duration of individual permits, as well as the possibility of exploiting the resource. ELR: Rybnik Reservoir – the duration of the positive impact is assessed to be continuous. |
|
| reversibility or irreversibility of effects | Groundwater and surface water abstraction is carried out in accordance with hydrogeological documentation and permits. Resources are managed rationally to ensure their renewability. Where required, binding protection zones have been established, which specify prohibitions, orders and restrictions on land use and water use. Activities do not cause harm to the aquatic environment and terrestrial ecosystems. Also, the discharge of wastewater into receiving bodies is carried out in accordance with permits and does not cause irreversible effects. | |
| 2b | Significant indirect positive and negative impacts in relation to the following: | No indirect impact. |
| 1a | Nature of significant direct impacts on biodiversity in relation to one or more of the following: | |
| Construction or use of production facilities, mines and transport infrastructure | As part of the planned investments related to the construction of new, low-emission emission sources, a nature inventory was carried out as part of the procedure for obtaining an environmental decision for specific sites within the boundaries of existing CHPs. The planned investments are located away from existing forms of nature conservation. | |
| Contamination (introduction of substances that do not naturally occur in the habitat) | not applicable | |
| Introduction of invasive species, pests and pathogens | not applicable | |
| Species extinction | not applicable | |
| Habitat destruction | Valuable or protected habitats are located at considerable distances so that they are not affected by the impact and comply with environmental legislation. These are typical industrial areas, characterised by low biodiversity. The investments will not be environmentally burdensome, i.e. they will not emit harmful compounds, substances or generate noise to an extent that could adversely affect the natural surroundings. | |
| Changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability (such as salinity or changes in groundwater levels) | All investments were preceded by obtaining a decision on environmental conditions. The process of obtaining the decision involves gathering a lot of information about the environment in the location of the planned project. At this stage, field surveys were carried out to inventory potential animal and plant species, as well as the habitats located there. None of the projects required significant interference with the natural environment. | |
| 1b | Nature of significant indirect impacts on biodiversity in relation to one or more of the following: | |
| Construction or use of production facilities, mines and transport infrastructure | The purpose of the nature inventories was to examine whether there might be species (in particular protected species) and their habitats and natural habitats in the area designated for the investment, including those within the range of the impact of the investment. Recognition was also made of ecological corridors of animal migration of local importance remaining within the impact range of the investment. The area of the planned investments is located within the boundaries of the existing thermal power plants, directly adjacent to the existing installations and occupied by unused ruderal land. The herbaceous vegetation overgrowing the area is ruderal, segregated, dryland communities. |
|
| Contamination (introduction of substances that do not naturally occur in the habitat) | The investments will not be environmentally burdensome, i.e. they will not emit harmful compounds, substances or generate noise to an extent that could adversely affect the natural surroundings. The decarbonisation process initiated in PGE EC will contribute to the elimination of coal sources. At the moment, the most important investments concern the replacement of coal sources with gas sources emitting significantly less pollution. On the energy scale, gas is considered the reference fuel. | |
| Introduction of invasive species, pests and pathogens | not applicable | |
| Species extinction | not applicable | |
| Habitat destruction | not applicable | |
| Changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability (such as salinity or changes in groundwater levels) | answer in accordance with point 1a in this regard | |
| 2b | Significant direct positive and negative impacts in relation to the following: | The planned development areas are located within the boundaries of the existing CHP plants, directly adjacent to the existing installations and occupied by unused ruderal land. The herbaceous vegetation overgrowing the area is ruderal, segregated, dryland communities. The investment will not cause any environmental nuisance, i.e. it will not emit harmful compounds, substances or generate noise to an extent that could adversely affect the natural surroundings. |
| 2a | Significant indirect positive and negative impacts in relation to the following: | |
| 1a |
Nature of significant direct impact on biodiversity for one or more of the following: (please describe) |
|
| Construction or use of production facilities, mines and transport infrastructure | The hydroelectric power station in Solina with a pumped storage unit is located at the base of the concrete dam. The hydroelectric power station consists of an underwater part and a machinery hall with an auxiliary building. The installations in the hydroelectric power plant consist of equipment used to generate electricity. The power plant is equipped with 4 vertical turbine sets, including 2 turbine sets with classic Francis turbines and 2 turbine sets with reversible Francis turbines. Water is supplied to the turbines from the Solina reservoir through water intakes constituting steel pipelines concreted in the body of the Solina dam. The worked water is discharged through the outlets of these pipelines to the Myczkowce reservoir. The Myczkowce hydropower station consists of a reservoir, an earth dam with a concrete overflow part, a pressure tunnel supplying water to the power station, an impact chamber, the Myczkowce hydroelectric power station and the Myczkowce offshore wind farm. The Myczkowce hydroelectric power station is equipped with two vertical turbine units with Kaplan-type turbines. Water to the turbines is fed from the Myczkowce reservoir via a pressure tunnel, while the rinsed water is discharged into the San River. Offshore wind farm Myczkowce was built in 2006. Water to the power station is supplied from Myczkowce reservoir. The discharge of rinsed water takes place into the river San below the Myczkowce dam. The small hydropower plant operates throughout the year as a run-of-river power plant from the natural flow, thus ensuring the realisation of the biological flow below the Myczkowce dam. The power plant operates in an automatic, unmanned system with a remote control visualisation system. During the operation of the installation at the Solina – Myczkowce hydroelectric power station, no dust or gases are emitted into the environment. For wind farms there is a lack of data with such a high level of detail, in 2022 no assessment procedure was carried out for an investment in an area of high biodiversity, such as a Natura 2000 area, which would additionally be implemented. Indeed, direct or indirect impacts should, within the framework of environmental indicators, be examined in relation to realised projects and not those that have obtained an environmental decision. This is due to the fact that obtaining the EIA is not tantamount to the execution of the given investment, which requires obtaining further permits and decisions (WZ, WTP, PnB). | |
| Contamination (introduction of substances that do not naturally occur in the habitat) | Sewage disposal is carried out in accordance with the water permits held. | |
| Introduction of invasive species, pests and pathogens | not applicable | |
| Species extinction | not applicable | |
| Habitat destruction | not applicable | |
| Changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability (such as salinity or changes in groundwater levels) | not applicable | |
| 1b |
Nature of significant indirect effects on biodiversity in relation to one or more of the following: (please describe) |
|
| Construction or use of production facilities, mines and transport infrastructure | answer in accordance with point 1a in this regard | |
| Contamination (introduction of substances that do not naturally occur in the habitat) | answer in accordance with point 1a in this regard | |
| Introduction of invasive species, pests and pathogens | not applicable | |
| Species extinction | not applicable | |
| Habitat destruction | not applicable | |
| Changes in ecological processes outside the natural range of variability (such as salinity or changes in groundwater levels)zmiany poziomu wód gruntowych) | not applicable | |
| 2a | Significant direct positive and negative impacts in relation to the following: | There is a Natura 2000 SAC (Upper San River Basin) on the San River above the Solina Reservoir and below the Myczkowce Dam. Individual river sections included in the Natura 2000 area are directly adjacent to or part of the East Beskid Mountains Protected Landscape Area and the East Carpathian International Biosphere Reserve. The area borders on the SAC and SPA Góry Słonne and SAC and SPA Bieszczady. There are 3 nature reserves in the area: Nad jeziorem Myczkowieckim, Przełom Sanu pod Mokrem and Przełom Sanu pod Grodziskiem. The technological process, the exploitation of the facilities and the investments carried out in the Unit do not cause interference in the biodiversity of the protected areas. |
| 2a | Significant indirect positive and negative impacts in relation to the following: | |
Habitats protected or restored
-
304-3
| 1 | Size of all habitat areas protected or restored |
|
| 2 | Location of all habitat areas protected or restored | ELT: 1. Areas of protected habitats within the Natura 2000 area PLH02006 Przełomowa Dolina Nysy Łużyckiej – max. up to 20 km from ELT Branch: 3150 Old river beds and eutrophic water reservoirs – 32 patches – 14.07 ha; 3260 Lowland and submontane rivers with Trichophyton communities -38 ha; 6410 Molinia meadows – 8 ha; 6430 Mountain and riparian herbs – 10 patches of less than 500 m2; 6510 Lowland and submontane fresh meadows – 31 patches – 121 ha; 9130 Fertile beech forests – 6 patches – 52.75 ha; 9170 Central European oak-hornbeam – 45 patches – 144 ha; 9180 Maple-leaf forest – 1 habitat – 0.2 ha; 91E0 Willow, poplar, alder and ash forests – 26 patches – 16 ha. 2. Natural areas outside Natura 2000 area in the area of Bogatynia Municipality – up to 7,5 km from the ELT Branch: 6510 Lowland and submontane fresh meadows – 9 patches – 13.4 ha; 9130 Fertile beech forests – 6 patches – 52.75 ha; 9170 Central European oakhornbeam – 22 patches – 62.5 ha; 91E0 Willow, poplar, alder and ash forests – 2 patches – 14.5 ha. ELR: Pursuant to Decree No. 181/93 of the Katowice Voivode of 23 November 1993 (Official Journal of the Katowice Voivodeship No. 15*, item 130), highly urbanised areas were excluded from the Landscape Park „Cystercian Landscape Compositions of the Ore Mountains”, including the Rybnik Power Plant together with the reservoir of water used for technological purposes, the so-called „Rybnik Reservoir”. The area of the Rybnik Power Plant is anthropogenically transformed and constantly influenced by human activity. There is no vegetation except grass. The mammal fauna is poor, being composed of species habitually associated with these areas. The nearest Natura 2000 sites are located at a much greater distance than the analysed fifty times the height of the highest point of gas or dust introduction into the air, i.e. 6.5 km from Elektrownia Rybnik. No protected habitats in the area of Elektrownia Rybnik. Rybnik Reservoir and the surrounding area is a habitat for animals, also covered by species protection, while the site itself is not an area of protected habitats. KWB: reclamation of the external dump of Pole Szczerców and the internal dump of Pole Bełchatów. |
| 3 | Has the target effect of habitat restoration been or is it approved by independent external experts? | YES |
| 4 | Are there partnerships with other organisations for habitat protection or restoration, other than where the organisation has overseen and implemented conservation or restoration activities? | NO |
| 5 | Please indicate the status of each area, based on their status at the end of the reporting period | Mines: land rehabilitated/undergoing rehabilitation Power plants: areas under monitoring |
| 6 | Please indicate the standards, methodologies and assumptions used | Identification according to the guidelines in Interpretation Manual ver 27 (2007) Technical documents |
no data
| 1 | Size of all habitat areas protected or restored | WINDOW FARMS – Ordinance on the establishment of a Management Plan of Protective Tasks for the Natura 2000 area PLB320009 Zalew Szczeciński is currently in preparation (RDOŚ Szczecin, Urząd Morski Szczecin). Sites of priority bird species will be indicated in the PZO. 6. 7186.16 ha.
PORĄBKA -Data concerning the Natura 2000 area – Beskid Mały, which neighbours the facilities of the Branch. The data comes from the website of the General Directorate for Environmental Protection. |
| 2 | Location of all habitat areas protected or restored | Porąbka – Area code PLH240023 |
| 3 | Has the target effect of habitat restoration been or is it approved by independent external experts? | NO |
| 4 | Are there partnerships with other organisations for habitat protection or restoration, other than where the organisation has overseen and implemented conservation or restoration activities? | NO |
| 5 | Status of individual areas, based on their status at the end of the reporting period | not applicable |
| 6 | Please indicate the standards, methodologies and assumptions used | Porąbka – information obtained from the website of the General Directorate for Environmental Protection |
IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations
-
304-4
| 1 | Total number of IUCN Red List and National Conservation List species with habitats in areas affected by the organisation’s activities by level of risk of extinction: | |
| Critically endangered | not identified | |
| Endangered | not identified | |
| Exposed | ELR: grebe | |
| Imminent threats | KWT: Blue-throated Praying Mantis, Blue-throated Praying Mantis | |
| Less vulnerable | ELT:
ELR: Aquarius, dirk |
|
no data
| 1 | Total number of IUCN Red List and National Conservation List species with habitats in areas affected by the organisation’s activities by level of risk of extinction: | |
|---|---|---|
| Critically endangered | not identified | |
| Endangered | not identified | |
| Exposed | 1 | |
| Imminent threats | 1 | |
| Less vulnerable | 29 |
In the area PLB320009 Zalew Szczecinski at least 25 bird species from the Annex I of the Birds Directive occur, 9 species from the Polish Red Book (PCK). It should be emphasized that the species mentioned above occur in the entire area of Natura 2000 PLB320009 Zalew Szczeciński, therefore also in inland waters or in ecosystems suitable for them (e.g. forest, rushes), which does not have to mean their occurrence in the area of PGE EO activity on land – in the area of arable fields. 7. The area of the company’s operations, operation of the facilities and conducted investments do not cause interference in biodiversity of protected areas and areas outside protected areas. The water management carried out in the reservoirs and the operation of the power plant in particular does not pose significant threats to the ichthyofauna.
Waste management
Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts in 2022.
-
306-1
| Significant actual impacts of the organisation related to waste, including: | |
| Inputs, activities and outputs that lead to these impacts | PGE Górnictwo i Energetyka Konwencjonalna, being fully aware of the obligations resulting from its role as a producer of classic ash, fluidised bed ash and calcium sulphate (gypsum from FGD), carried out the relevant registrations of these substances with the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – pre-registration (2008) and registration proper (2010) in the largest tonnage range, i.e. above 1,000 tonnes/year. Such a tonnage band, i.e. the quantity produced/traded, required the preparation of registration dossiers to the fullest extent. |
| Do these impacts relate to waste generated within the organisation’s own operations or to waste generated upstream or downstream in its value chain? | The primary purpose of the production processes taking place in power plants is to generate electricity and heat, which are traded on the market. The process of producing electricity comes down to the conversion of the chemical energy of the fuel into heat, heat into mechanical energy and then mechanical energy into electricity. The basic process of converting the chemical energy of a fuel into heat takes place in boiler plants, through the process of oxidation. The combustion of fuels results in the release into the atmosphere of substances contained in the fuel, including sulphur dioxide, which adversely affects the environment through further reactions. Accompanying the main process is the flue gas desulphurisation process using wet technology. This technology is the most proven in the world energy industry, used for the flue gas desulphurisation process, classified as BAT. The company carries out many projects and investments to minimise its environmental impact and protect the natural ecosystems in its surroundings. |
| Significant actual impacts of the organisation related to waste, including: | |
|---|---|
| Inputs, activities and outputs that lead to these impacts | The input to the production process is fuels (coal, biomass, municipal waste), while the output is combustion by-products such as ash, slag and gypsum from flue gas cleaning. The majority of the post-process outfall volume is transferred to external customers, either as waste or by-product. Once in a while there are situations when the volume of transferred waste is higher than the current volume, which is due to the transfer of waste to external customers from the previous period’s stock. When waste has no economic use, it is sent to landfills. Taking into account the regulatory context and processes of the transition of energy sources, a gradual reduction in the volume of post-process waste should be expected in the coming years. |
| Do these impacts relate to waste generated within the organisation’s own operations or to waste generated upstream or downstream in its value chain? | As a general rule, the raw materials (fuels) and substances used for the production of electricity and heat are sourced from outside the organisation (the exception is municipal waste, which is already waste to begin with and is recovered at wasteto-energy incinerator). |
| Significant actual impacts of the organisation related to waste, including: | |
|---|---|
| Inputs, activities and outputs that lead to these impacts | In the operation of the facilities, waste classified as hazardous and non-hazardous is generated. The waste generated is handed over to a specialist company with the legally required waste management permits. Transport is outsourced to a specialist company, which collects the waste for disposal. In addition, waste treatment of rivers is carried out at aquatic facilities. |
| Do these impacts relate to waste generated within the organisation’s own operations or to waste generated upstream or downstream in its value chain? | The facilities generate waste during operation, servicing, repair and maintenance work. The amount of waste generated is small and is entirely handed over to authorised collectors. Once generated, segregation and selective storage of generated waste is carried out in a way that prevents its negative impact on the environment and human health. Measures are carried out to reduce the generation of waste „at source”. |
For PGE Dystrybucja – no significant impact on waste generation from ongoing electricity investments.
Waste generated in 2022.
-
306-3
| Total weight of waste generated (in metric tonnes) | 6 530 571 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 6 529 619.5 |
| Hazardous waste | 951.5 |
| Total weight of waste generated (in metric tonnes) | 500 643 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 495 783 |
| Hazardous waste | 4 860 |
| Total weight of waste generated (in metric tonnes) | 940 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 906 |
| Hazardous waste | 34 |
| Total weight of waste generated (in metric tonnes) | 3 698 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 2 527 |
| Hazardous waste | 1 171 |
Waste recovered in 2022.
-
306-4
| Total weight of waste recovered (in metric tonnes) | 3 913 364.5 |
| Total weight of recovered waste by waste category | |
| Non-hazardous waste | 3 912 899 |
| Hazardous waste | 465 |
| Total weight of hazardous waste recovered (in metric tonnes) | 465 |
| Total weight of hazardous waste recovered by recovery method | |
| Preparation for re-use | total, t |
|
within the organisation |
0 |
|
outside the organisation |
0 |
| Recycling | 129 |
|
within the organisation |
0 |
|
outside the organisation |
129 |
| Other waste recovery methods | 336 |
|
within the organisation |
0 |
|
outside the organisation |
336 |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste recovered (in metric tonnes) | |
| Total weight of recovered non-hazardous waste by recovery method (in metric tonnes) | 3 912 899 |
| Preparation for re-use | total, t |
|
within the organisation |
0 |
|
outside the organisation |
0 |
| Recycling | 5 056.5 total, t |
|
within the organisation |
0 |
|
outside the organisation |
5 056.5 |
| Other waste recovery methods | 3 907 843 total, t |
|
within the organisation |
3 903 991 |
|
outside the organisation |
3 852 |
| Method of determining waste treatment | |
| Other contextual information necessary to understand the data and how it was collated. | Quantitative data based on BDO records. Information on waste management is obtained from recipients, in contracts with individuals and administrative decisions held by waste collectors. |
| Total weight of waste recovered (in metric tonnes) | 527 648 |
| Total weight of recovered waste by waste category | |
| Non-hazardous waste | 522 805 |
| Hazardous waste | 4 843 |
| Total weight of hazardous waste recovered (in metric tonnes) | 4 843 |
| Total weight of hazardous waste recovered by recovery method | |
| Preparation for re-use | total, t |
| within the organisation | |
| outside the organisation | |
| Recycling | total, t |
| within the organisation | |
| outside the organisation | |
| Other waste recovery methods | total, t |
| within the organisation | |
| outside the organisation | 4 843 |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste recovered (in metric tonnes) | 522 805 |
| Total weight of recovered non-hazardous waste by recovery method (in metric tonnes) | |
| Preparation for re-use | total, t |
| within the organisation | |
| outside the organisation | |
| Recycling | total, t |
| within the organisation | |
| outside the organisation | |
| Other waste recovery methods | total, t |
| within the organisation | 86 865 |
| outside the organisation | 435 941 |
| Method of determining waste treatment | |
| Other contextual information necessary to understand the data and how it was collated. | Quantitative data based on BDO records. Information on waste management is obtained from recipients, in contracts with individuals and administrative decisions held by waste collectors. |
The indicator does not apply to these companies
Waste transferred for disposal in 2022
-
306-5
| Total weight of waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 4 580 196 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 4 579 795 |
| Hazardous waste | |
| Total weight of hazardous waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 400.45 |
| Total weight of recovered hazardous waste sent for disposal by treatment method | 400.45 |
| Incineration (with energy recovery) | 0 |
| within the organisation | 0 |
| outside the organisation | 0 |
| Incineration (without energy recovery) | 0 |
| within the organisation | 0 |
| outside the organisation | 0 |
| Landfill | 0 |
| within the organisation | 0 |
| outside the organisation | 0 |
| Other treatment methods | 400.45 |
| within the organisation | 0 |
| outside the organisation | 400.45 |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 4 579 395 |
| Total weight of recovered non-hazardous waste sent for disposal by treatment method | |
| Incineration (with energy recovery) | 0 |
| within the organisation | 0 |
| outside the organisation | 0 |
| Incineration (without energy recovery) | 0 |
| within the organisation | 0 |
| outside the organisation | 0 |
| Landfill | 4 286 817 |
| within the organisation | 4 269 182 |
| outside the organisation | 17 635 |
| Other treatment methods | 292 578 |
| within the organisation | 168 520 |
| outside the organisation | 124 058 |
| Method of determining waste treatment |
| Total weight of waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 73 345 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 73 344.5 |
| Hazardous waste | 0.817 |
| Total weight of hazardous waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | |
| Total weight of recovered hazardous waste sent for disposal by treatment method | 0.817 |
| Incineration (with energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Incineration (without energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Landfill | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Other treatment methods | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | 0.817 |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | not applicable |
| Total weight of recovered non-hazardous waste sent for disposal by treatment method | 73 344 |
| Incineration (with energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Incineration (without energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Landfill | total, t |
| within the organisation | 48 133 |
| outside the organisation | 25 210 |
| Other treatment methods | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Method of determining waste treatment |
| Total weight of waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 920 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 886 |
| Hazardous waste | 34 |
| Total weight of hazardous waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 34 |
| Total weight of recovered hazardous waste sent for disposal by treatment method | |
| Incineration (with energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Incineration (without energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Landfill | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Other treatment methods | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | 34 |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 886 |
| Total weight of recovered non-hazardous waste sent for disposal by treatment method | not applicable |
| Incineration (with energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Incineration (without energy recovery) | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Landfill | not applicable |
| within the organisation | total, t |
| outside the organisation | not applicable |
| Other treatment methods | total, t |
| within the organisation | not applicable |
| outside the organisation | 886 |
| Method of determining waste treatment | Under the Waste Act and waste generation permits. |
| Total weight of waste sent for disposal (in metric tonnes) | 3698 |
| Non-hazardous waste | 2 527 |
| Hazardous waste | 1171 |
Waste management at PGE Dystrybucja is carried out in accordance with the standardised „Waste Management Manual at PGE Dystrybucja SA”. On the basis of signed agreements with subcontractors, waste generators are subcontractors who transfer waste in BDO to authorised operators. The same applies to waste generated by PGE Dystrybucja, where waste is also transferred in BDO to authorised operators.
Monetary value of significant fines and total number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations at companies that have the biggest impact on the surroundings [PLN].
-
Own indicator
| PGE GiEK | 2022 | Commentary |
| Amount of cash penalties imposed in given year for violations of environmental protection laws and regulations | PLN 10,000 |
ELB With the decision of the Łódzkie Voivodeship Inspector of Environmental Protection of 2.12.2022, PGE GiEK SA Oddział Elektrownia Bełchatów was imposed an administrative fine for operating a visual inspection system of waste storage sites in quaternary A of the landfill site for non-hazardous and nonobsolete waste in Rogowiec contrary to the provisions of art. 25(6a) of the Waste Act of December 14, 2012. |
| 166.98 PLN/day. |
KWB By a decision of the Lodz Voivodeship Environmental Protection Inspector of 14.11.2022, the running penalty for exceeding the permissible noise level in 2018 (concerns Kamien 36) was decided. The total amount of the penalty for the exceedance in question will be determined by a separate administrative decision. |
|
| PLN 88 756.00 |
KWB Penalty for exceeding noise limit in 2022. |
|
| PLN 5 000.00 |
KWT Penalty for using water without the required water permit. |
|
| Value of cash penalties paid/to be paid during the year for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations | PLN 10 000 |
ELB With the decision of the Łódzkie Voivodeship Inspector of Environmental Protection of 2.12.2022, an administrative fine was imposed on PGE GiEK SA Oddział Elektrownia Bełchatów for operating a visual inspection system of waste storage sites in the A quarter of the landfill site for non-hazardous and inert waste in Rogowiec contrary to the provisions of art. 25(6a) of the Waste Act of December 14, 2012. |
| PGE EC and subsidiaries | 2022 | Commentary |
| Amount of cash penalties imposed in given year for violations of environmental protection laws and regulations | 0 | |
| Value of cash penalties paid/to be paid during the year for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations | 0 |
| PGE Energia Odnawialna | 2022 | Commentary |
| Amount of cash penalties imposed in given year for violations of environmental protection laws and regulations | 0 | |
| Value of cash penalties paid/to be paid during the year for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations | 0 |
| PGE Dystrybucja | 2022 | Commentary |
| Amount of cash penalties imposed in given year for violations of environmental protection laws and regulations | 0 | |
| Value of cash penalties paid/to be paid during the year for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations | 0 |
SELECTED INDICATORS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL AREA AT PGE SA:
The following indicators demonstrate the company’s approach to managing its environmental impact in terms of energy, water and paper consumption at the PGE SA site.
| Annual electricity consumption at PGE SA headquarters | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy for administrative purposes (MWh) | 1 785 | 1 716 | 1 594 |
| Energy for administrative and technical purposes (server rooms) (MWh) | 853 | 914 | 909 |
Energy consumption for administrative purposes has increased slightly compared to the previous year. This can be influenced by the higher number of occupants in the building as well as weather conditions (fewer days of sunshine).
| Annual consumption of thermal energy at PGE SA headquarters | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual thermal energy consumption (in GJ) | 7 453 | 8 460 | 6 980 |
| Annual thermal energy consumption (w GJ/m3) | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
Annual heat consumption decreased slightly year on year. A possible influence on the lower heat consumption may be the investment currently being made to replace the windows.
| Annual consumption of sheets of paper at PGE SA headquarters | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper for office printing (counted in A4 format, sheets) | 835 449 | 841 958 | 873 085 |
| Use of paper for office printing (A4 format/person) | 1021 | 1 201 | 1 317 |
Paper consumption per employee of PGE SA is regularly decreasing. Increased employee awareness, as well as the electronic circulation of documents and correspondence, contribute to lower paper consumption.
| Annual water consumption and wastewater discharge at PGE S.A.’s headquarters | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual water consumption and wastewater discharge (m3) | 5 399 | 4 711 | 4 152 |
| Annual water consumption and wastewater discharge (m3/person) | 6.6 | 6.7 | 6.3 |
Water consumption and sewage disposal have increased due to the ongoing renovation work on the building, as well as the higher number of occupants, both employees and visitors.
| Annual toner consumption at PGE S.A.’s headquarters | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual toner consumption (in pcs) | 218 | 130 | 183 |
| Annual toner consumption (in pcs/person) | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.27 |
The number of toner units purchased is higher due to the centralisation of business areas and an increase in the number of locations for which new printers must be provided with toner.
| Energy-efficient LED lamps at PGE S.A.’s headquarters | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| LED lamps (in %) | 80 | 71 | 66 |
Due to the pandemic period, renovation work was put on hold, so the luminaries were replaced to a minor extent.